|
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL – CAT |
|
Govt employees near retirement should not be disturbed: CAT The Central Administrative Tribunal has held that government employees on the verge of superannuation should not be disturbed merely because they have stayed for a considerably long period at a particular place. The apex tribunal said that such a benefit should be extended to superannuating employees to retire peacefully at a particular place after years of dedicated service. “Merely because the applicants have a long stay and the transfer order could not be implemented so far would not by itself constitute sufficient reason. “There is an objective based on considerations of welfare behind such provision in the transfer policy as it would enable a person about to retire after a long and devoted service to make arrangements for settling down thereafter with his family, acquire a house if not already done,” Member N D Dayal said. |
Source: PTI
sir , my suprannuation date is 31/08/2013; I AM A SR. EXECTIVE IN PUBLIC SECTOR; ON 10TH. JUNE 2011 I WAS FORCED TO CARRY-OUT AN ORDER OF JUNE 2009 AGAINST MY WILLINGNESS.my requests are with the NTPC-C0NCERNS AS BELOW:
TO, DT.: 23.07.2011
THE DIRECTOR HUMAN RESURCES,
NTPC LTD.,
NTPC BHAWAN, CORE-7, SCOPE COMPLEX,
7, INSTITUTIONAL AREA, LODHIROAD,
NEW DELHI-110003 FAX: 01124360912
Sub: Repeated request of transfer of Sri Om Prakash Sharan ; Employee No :041434; Sr Manager/ C&M/DSTPP is being ignored by your honorable administration since his stay at KBUNL ( from June 2008 TO 10th June 2011). In spite Sri Sharan was forced to carry out the office order no: 82/2009-10 dated.15.5.2009 on 10th. June 2011. i.e. at an interval after two years.
Sir,
May please go through the quoting “There is an objective based on considerations of welfare behind such provision in the transfer policy as it would enable a person about to retire after a long and devoted service to make arrangements for settling down thereafter with his family, acquire a house if not already done etc. This would take a reasonable period of time and two years has been considered appropriate” details as below:
A. September 13, 2010Tags: CAT, Central Administrative Tribunal, Central Government Employees, Near Retirement Posted in: CCS Rules
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL – CAT
Govt employees near retirement should not be disturbed: CAT
The Central Administrative Tribunal has held that government employees on the verge of superannuation should not be disturbed merely because they have stayed for a considerably long period at a particular place.
The apex tribunal said that such a benefit should be extended to superannuating employees to retire peacefully at a particular place after years of dedicated service.
“
Merely because the applicants have a long stay and the transfer order could not be implemented so far would not by itself constitute sufficient reason.
“
There is an objective based on considerations of welfare behind such provision in the transfer policy as it would enable a person about to retire after a long and devoted service to make arrangements for settling down thereafter with his family, acquire a house if not already done,” Member N D Dayal said.
Based on The above statements of “Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi.OA-1965/2010, New Delhi this the 1st day of September, 2010.Hon ble Sh. N.D. Dayal, Member(A)”it clearly indicates you are doing an injustice to me ignoring my repeated requests for transfer to ER-I-HQ-PATNA. Persons holding honorable chair must respect dignity values of their chair abiding rule of low & justice. Again & Again I am requesting you pl. transfer me to ER-I-HQ- PATTNA on health ground; as stated earlier my both eyes & abdomen are operated , I have to continue on regular checkups at intervals at MAGADH HOSPITAL ; my wife is anemic, low BP, Thyroid -patient , she is continuing her life on regular -checkups. MY RETIREMENT IS ON 31ST AUG 2013 i.e. two years left
Thanking you
Your faithfully
O.P.SHARAN
SR. MANAGER (C&M)/DSTPP/NTPC
Copy to:S.ROY/ED /HR – FAX: 011-243149973;R.Venkateswaran / RED/ER-II-HQ FAX:0674-2540919 ;M.S.D.Bhattamishra,/AGM/HR/ER-II-HQ;S.K. REDDY /GM/DSTPP;CMD – for kind information please.
The 6th pay commission given instruction to retention of wife and husband at the same station or within the state. But nobody accepting the spouse retention order. Can do any anyful actions by CAT please.