Cadre Restructure |
No.35034/9/2010-Estt.(D)
North Block, New Delhi
Subject: Review of Cadre structuring – Regarding
(Smita Kumar) |
CENTRAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES NEWS DOPT ORDERS
DOPT, DOPT Orders, Expected DA, Employment News, Central Govt. Employees News, Centralgovernmentemployeesnews
admin 3 Comments
Cadre Restructure |
No.35034/9/2010-Estt.(D)
North Block, New Delhi
Subject: Review of Cadre structuring – Regarding
(Smita Kumar) |
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Sir/Madam
i am working cbec for last two years.this department being a revenue collection department as CBDT, rules are different. In CBDT they have inter commissionerate Transfer, whereas we don’t. They are getting mobile connection,we don’t. why this step mother behaviour by the Ministry of Finance, are they knowing lthe problem of this department Group -C cadre real problem. Why we don’t have ICT? Can any body reply.
Please refer DOPT’s Office Memorandum No.11/1/20-JCA dated 6-10-2010 and Office Memorandum No.35034/9/2010 –Estt.(D) dt.10-02-2011.
It is observed that the issue of providing an option to organization/cadres to have a choice for opt between the old ACPS and new MACPS shows a mixed response from organization and cadres.
This is because the employees, who were granted Ist and IInd ACP upgradations after completing 24 years of service, are awaiting for 3rd upgradation under MACPS on completion of 30 years of service. If entire organization/cadres opt for old ACPS, the 3rd upgradation is not possible under ACPS. This is a monetary loss for them.
On the other hand, many employees give their support for old ACPS, because under old ACPS only they can get the grade pay of promotional hierarchy (which benefit their compatriots are enjoying as they have completed 24 years of service before 01-09-2008). But under the new MACPS they can get the grade pay of immediate next hierarchy only. This is a great monetary loss for them.
Hence, the ‘immediate next hierarchy’ is the thorn in the palm.
It must be mercifully modified for the benefit of our employees.
Especially, in the case of LDC-UDC-Head Clerk, the grade pay is 1900-2400-4200 respectively. But the grade pay of Rs.2800/ was inserted as the immediate next hierarchy (under MACPS). The difference between promotional hierarchy and immediate next hierarchy is a huge 1400 rupees.
This can be mitigated. Some suggestions are given below:
In the departments, where, there is no post, bearing Rs. 2800 as grade pay in the line of LDC-UDC-Head Clerk, the immediate next hierarchy may be taken as 1900-2400-4200 and in the departments, where, there is post, bearing the grade pay of Rs.2800 ( senior clerk’s ) it may be taken as 1900-2400-2800 as like in the line of LDC-UDC-SENIOR CLERK.
As an alternative option, providing the option between ACPS and MACPS may be given to individuals with 3rd upgradation will be on completion of 30 years of service if there is no promotion. To mention it clear, that, the Ist and IInd upgradation will be under ACPS and the third will be under MACPS. So that one can get three upgradations in ones service.
This will give some mitigation to those, who were covered under old ACPS upto 31-08-2008 and shifted to MACPS after 01-09-2008.
It is requested that, this anomaly may be considered and solved by the upcoming NAC on 15-02-2011 generously.
I am working as Stenographer in a Central Govt. Institute since 1989 and still I am in the entry level only without any promotion. I have passed old pattern SSLC and did my Stenography course . Later I did my graduation through the Open University System from Annamalai University and got my degree, BA History . Now there is a PA post vacant in my office and I am the senior most person to be considered for this post but in my office they said as per NEW RR, 10+2+3 qualification is a must for Personal Assistant post and they kept my matter pending for quite a long time. Being a serviced candidate I have not got the due recognition, which hurts me a lot. I have around 10 years of service.
Please let me know whether with my current qualification am I eligible for the promotion?
Also I would like to know when did the NEW Recruitment Rule come into force?