The second National Anomaly Committee Meeting – Discussion and Decisions
|
NATIONAL ANOMALY COMMITTEE MEETING AND DECISIONS |
|
The second National Anomaly Committee Meeting was held on 27.03.2010 (Saturday). Main issues discussed in the meeting… Modified ACP – Agreed to constitute a Joint Committee Pay parity with new entrants – Still hope is there. Increment falls Feb-Jun – Final decision before June 2010. Increment postpone due to Extra ordinary leave – Under consideration. Retired/Died between 1.1.06 and 1.9.08 – The matter stands settled. Next NAC meeting – June 2010 The complete details of discussion writtern by the Secretary General in his website (Confederation of Central Government Employees Federation). We reproduced the same as given below:-
Conf No.9/2010
Dated: 27th March, 2010.
Dear Comrade
Sub:- National Anomaly Committee meeting
The 2nd meeting of the National Anomaly Committee was held today under the Chairmanship of the Secretary Personnel. The Confederation was represented by Com.Vyas, President and Com. K.K.N. Kutty, Secretary General.
The Chairman in his initial opening remarks said that it would be the endeavour of the Government to finalise the issues of anomaly as fast as possible. Since there had been difference in perception on certain issues, they had to be gone into in detail and would take time more than expected. He said that the National Council meeting which was scheduled to take place last month had to be postponed for reasons beyond. He added that the same has now been scheduled to take place in May,15, 2010 and the notices have been issued. He expressed his happiness that the last meeting had been held in a very conducive atmosphere and hoped that all problems would be able to be settled through dialogue. Since the Official side representing the Pension department had to attend another meeting, he suggested to discuss the issues pertaining to Pensioners first before the other issues are taken up. The Staff Side agreed to this suggestion.
Com. Raghavaiah, Leader Staff Side while thanking the official side for convening the second meeting thanked the Chairman for the assurance of a speedy settlement of the issues. He hoped that the official side, having not circulated the Action Taken Statement on the issues discussed at the last meeting, would indicate of the progress registered on those issues. He then dealt with various problems emanating from the implementation of the MACP. While the MACP assures three financial up gradation for every employees, it has resulted in certain difficulties for the existing employees. The liberalization that is stated to have been done to the Assured progression scheme, he said, has resulted in the de-liberalization in the case of certain employees. H expressed the hope that the official side would be ale to appreciate these problems and resolve them.
Com. Purohit thanked the Chairman for his statement of finding settlement to all problems through discussions. He added that the JCM was in fact formulated for that purpose and it has worked very well, through there had been aberration in the past in the periodicity of meeting etc. He said that the 6th CPC has treaded a path different than those of all other earlier Pay Commission, as they have introduced a new concept in the Pay structure of Central Government employees. Initially the employees have only looked at the financial benefit but later they have realized that there had been certain basic changes effected. He then reiterated his statement made at the last meeting over the definition of the term anomaly. The understanding reached was to have the same definition for the term anomaly as was given at the time of setting up of the anomaly committee after the 5th CPC recommendation. That was on the basis of an agreement reached between the Staff Side and the Group of Ministers. Since the Government functions are mostly on the precedence, he was afraid that the present definition would be quoted in future too. He, therefore wanted this fact to be properly recorded so that the present definition afforded to the term anomaly would not be a dilution of what it was earlier. He then pointed out that while all allowance in general had been doubled by the 6th CPC for which there had been a specific recommendation, in some cases, the Commission had recommended for replacement of such allowances by another scheme viz. insurance etc. The Insurance scheme has still not been introduced whereas the allowances were withdrawn. He was of the opinion that these allowances must be continued till such time the alternative scheme is ushered after consultation with the Staff side and the same should be appropriately doubled. He cited the issue pertaining to Patient care allowance and the risk allowance. He said that the insurance scheme envisaged would not be easy for being settled as many issues emanating there from will have to be discussed threadbare.
Regarding the issues emanating from the MACP scheme, he requested the Chairman, to set up a separately committee with a few from the official side and staff side where all issues could be discussed and then brought to the Committee for its final approval or rejection as the case may be He also referred to the issue of merger of CCA with transport allowance and the repercussion especially in the matter of overtime emoluments of industrial workers. He expressed the hope that the Committee would be able to address all issues and settle them in an amicable manner.
The Chairman, in reply to the initial remarks made by the Leader and Secretary said that: (a) Joint Committee may be set up for discussing the MACP related issues; (b) Reiterated his request that all problems and difficulties faced by the employees in implementation of the 6th CPC may be brought to the notice of the Department of Personnel and these could be addressed and placed on website of the Department, so that it could obviate reference to various nodal departments of the Government. The employees could be given the clarification on these issues. Com. Vyas said that the proposed insurance scheme would not take care of the risk factor both of industrial workers and health workers, who are covered by the risk allowance and the patient care allowance. These allowances ought to have been doubled, whereas the risk allowance has been totally stopped without introducing the The following issues were discussed, thereafter. (I) Pension related issues. Agenda Item No. 8. Item closecd as having been settled in the last meeting. (II) Item No. 9. Anomaly in pension for Govt. employees retired/died between 1.1.2006 and 1.9.2008. Having been permitted to opt which is beneficial i.e. last pay drawn or 10 months’ average and full pension after 20 years, the matter stands settled. (III) Item No. 10 dropped as per the minutes of the last meeting. (IV) Item No. 15. The official side stated that this was not acceptable even though they had examined it on the basis of the detailed submission by the Staff Side. (V) Item No.16. (*) and 21 The official side stated that it would not be possible for them to concede the demand of the staff side as orders have been issued strictly in accordance with the recommendation of the 6th CPC, which the staff side contested. They also did not agree to extend the benefit of last pay drawn and full pension after 20 years qualifying service in respect of pre 2006 retirees. (VI) Item No. 17.(*). The official side did not agree for the reasons they had stated against item No. 16 (VII) Item No. 18. (*) This anomaly has been removed by allowing the last pay drawn as the basis of pension computation for those retired on and after 1.1.2006. (VIII) Item No. 19 (*)The anomaly has been removed in the case of all those retired between 1.1.2006 and 1.9.2008 but did not agree to remove the anomaly in the case of persons retired prior to 1.1.2006 (IX) Item No. 22.(*) The issue stands settled by O.M. NO. 38/37/08-P& P W (A) Pt. I dated 3rd October, 2008. clarification at Para 5.1. (X) Item No. 23.(*) The matter is under examination. The Staff Side will submit a specific case for illustration of the issue. Relevant orders in similar matter after the 5th CPC recommendations were implemented will also be examined, (XI) Item No. 24(*) and 25 &26.( same issues) Not agreed. But clarificatory orders issued stating that no retrospective deduction should be made in respect of additional commuted value of pension. The reduction in pension must start from the date of payment of additional commuted value of pension. (XII) Item No.36. After some detailed discussion, it was decided that the Office side would examine this issue further. However, they have pointed out that the amount of Rs. 3500 fixed by them would automatically undergo change as when Dearness relief is grnted the partents / dependents. The Staff Side pointed out that every dependent or parent need not necessarily be a pensioner or a worker in the Govt. establishment or other institutions which pays periodical DA. (XIII) Item No. 40(*) not agreed. (XIV) Item No. 45(*) The issue is under Examination. (XV) Item No. 48. Restoration of commutation after 15 years. After some discussions, it was agreed that the calculation made by the Staff Side would be examined and decision taken thereafter. (XVI) Item Nos. 54 to 59 have been transferred to the Committee, which has been set up by the Government of Puducherry and therefore stand deleted from the list of National Anomaly Committee. The committee so set up ( as per the order given to the Staff side at the meeting) has only official side members. The representatives of the Association have only been permitted to present their case before the said committee. We are of the opinion that it should be a joint committee consisting of official side and staff side on the pattern on National Anomaly Committee. (XVII) Discussion on Action taken on items already subjected to discussion in the last meeting of the National Anomaly Committee. (i) Item No.1 to 4 and 5(iii) The Department of Expenditure after having looked into this matter as per the suggestion of the Chairman, in the last meeting, have stated that it was not possible to agree to the staff side demand. (ii) Item No. 5(i) Option. This is stated to be still under examination for delegation of power to the administering Ministry to allow the second option. (iii) Item No. 5(iv) The Staff Side pointed out the statement made by the JS(Per) which is incorporated in the minutes (as under) “in case where a promotee and post 1.1.2006 direct recruits are borne on the same seniority list and the senior is drawing less basic pay,than the junior, the pay of the senior can be stepped up.” The Staff Side pointed out that orders have been issued only in respect of Railways in this regard. The Staff Side therefore, requested for issuance of an order by the Department of Expenditure to cover the employees of other Ministries/Department. The Official Side however, insisted that such orders should only be issued by the concerned departments after obtaining necessary consent from the Department of Expenditure. It was pointed out by the Staff Side that the nodal department for issuance of such orders being the Department of Expenditure, the stand taken by the official side in the matter was not in order. After some discussion it was agreed that the Department of Expenditure will examine this issue further and if orders are to be issued by them, they would do so before the next meeting or else would report their stand in the matter to the next meeting. The issue per se i.e. A person who is promoted cannot be fixed on pay less than the minimum of the pay scale was raised by the Staff Side further. Normally a directly recruited person to a post is given the minimum of the pay scale or pay band to which he is appointed. The 6thCPC has recommended the minimum to which every directly recruited person was to be fixed. That being so, a promotee under the extant fundamental rules cannot be fixed less than such prescribed minimum. The Official side argued that the CCS(RSP) 2008 has modified the above provisions of FR for all time to come. The Staff side stated that no rule can be amended unilaterally which would adversely affect the service conditions. It cannot therefore, be unilaterally implemented. It will be further discussed in the next (iv)Item No. 5(v) Rule 9 Date of next increment. The preponement of increment in the case of those employees whose increment dates falls between 1.2.2006 to 1.6.2006 to 1.1.2006 in the pre- revised scale of pay as has been done in the case of persons whose increment date was on 1st January, 2006 would be considered further and decision taken before next meeting as a one time measure. (v)The Department of personnel has asked all administering Ministries to take up with them the matter of fixation of Grade pay at Rs. 1800 in the case of Temporary Status employees. They have also informed that wherever such reference has been received the same has been disposed of.. The organizations are, therefore, requested to take up the issue with the Heads of departments and ensure that a reference is made to the Department of Personnel so that the temporary status employees are imparted training and granted Rs. 1800 Grade pay with effect from 1.1.2006 (vi)Item No. 47(*) This issue was discussed at length. The problem of postponement of increment by one year in respect of persons availing extra ordinary leave on private affairs even for a day between 1st January and 30th June was highlighted by the Staff Side. The Official side explained that the clarification issued by them to the Ministry of Defence was on the basis of the extant instructions in the matter .After some discussion, the staff side proposed that if an employees has completed six months service during a particular year, he should be entitled to get his increment on Ist July. The Official side has agreed to consider this proposal and after such consideration they will issue appropriate orders before next meeting. The next meeting of the Anomaly Committee would be in the month of June, 2010. With greetings,
Yours fraternally, |
March 28, 2010
Tags: Anomaly, Discussion & Decisions, National Anomaly Committee, Second Meeting
Posted in: 6-CPC
Free Email Subscription
39 Responses
NOW WE GATHER THROUGH OUR SOURCES THAT UNDER RTI THE LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT CONFIRMED THAT THE STAFF CAR DRIVERS AND VAN DRIVERS OF PARLIAMENT SECRETARIAT HAVE BEEN GRANTED WITH PB-1 WITH GRADE PAY 2400 AT ENTRY LEVEL – SINCE DRIVERS ARE TERMED AS COMMON CATEGORY OF STAFF AND THEREFORE THEIR PAY WILL BE SAME EVERYWHERE, THIS DISPARITY IS UNSCIENTIFIC.
Sir,my basic is Rs.4500-7000,Im working as Technician-II and my qualification BSc.(PCM), PGDCSA(Computer Science),
MBA in System and Ph.d in HRD. My Organisation is Indian Institute of Geomagnetism under DST, Govt. of india,new PANVEL Navi Mumbai
I want to know about my fixation in VI Pay Commission
Sir, is there any one in the staffside who can speak regarding the Stenographer Gr.III / Gr.D. Whether the recommendation by 6 CPC regarding stenographer cadre will be discussed in Anomaly committee or not? Why all are silent.
Sir, is there any one in the staff side who can speak regarding the Jr. Assistants who are completing 20years of their services after 31st August2008. (As the employee who are completing 20years of their services before 31st August 2008 are getting 4200 Grade Pay under ACP Scheme and other side who are completing their 20 years services after 31st August 2008 are getting 2800/- G.P. under MACP) while Both type of employees are working same cadre.
Is any clarification stating Steno GR.II has been changed to Grade-I, has come from DOPT, Kindly inform
Sir, after VI pay commission my present BP is 11120 and GP is 2800 please tell me about my BP and GP after MACP. looking for your fast reply.
Sir,
Is there any upgradation regarding grade pay of LDC’s in central government offices. In the above discussion they had discussed the matter of Temporary Status Employees but nothing about LDC’s grade pay upgradation. Please took up this matter at the earliest and looking for a positive reply.
My grade pay is 4600/- but my junior level officers are in 5400/-GP. While on tour he is staying in AC hotel, as i am a higher officer, i cant stay in AC hotel. My junior officers can able to go in flight, but I can’t.
Physcially all are having same work responsibilities such as AE/AEE (Now AD-II/SDE). But AEE are not considered in the rotational transfer. only AD-II are transferred. Why. Also my grade pay is 4600/-, AEE & some of AD-II & all JE’s are in the GP of 5400/-.
In rotational transfer order, having 1.5 years for retirement are considered and retained in the same place. But Spouse working in state government is not considered consequently transferred to other states in central govt. why these much particality. If one order consider another order automatically needs to be taken into the account, Know.
Scale 6500/- was merged with 5000, 5500. Now can you tell me whether I am group B officer of group C officer.
Without clarify the anomaly why the central government officers enforceing the rotational transfer.
Respected Secretary,
As a LDC we are deprived from all respect in Grade pay of 6th CPC as well as MACPS. Please look into the matter to boost up the LDC’s Grade pay in next NAC Meeting.
Thanking you,
Sir, after VI pay commission my present Basic is 5830 and GP is 1900 please tell me about my Basic and GP after MACP. looking for your fast reply
Dear Sir,
I am an LDC My present Basic is 6070 and GP is 1900. I will be became UDC next year April- 2011 as per my seniority list. Please tell me what basic will be fixed on our promotion 6070 + 2400 or UDC minium Basic 7510 + 2400.
Sir,
Is there any upgradation regarding grade pay of LDC’s & UDC’s in central government offices. In the above discussion they had discussed the matter of Temporary Status Employees but nothing about LDC’s grade pay upgradation. Please take up matter at the earliest and looking for a positive reply.
what is the current status regarding revision of grade pay of UDC of working in Central Government?
We are waiting for revision of Grade Pay in respect of UDC, please post a reply whether there is any plan of govt for the same
Will the Staff Side Members clarify the following point or obtain clarification from the Ministry of Personnel and Communicate please ? If it requirs clarification in the Anomaly Committee, kindly take it up in the next Meeting scheduled to be held in June 2010.
Sub: Regulation of Pension in the case of an employee of Central Autonomous body appointed on immediate absorption basis in Central Government service.
An employee having 17 years of service in a permanent capacity in a Central Government Autonomous body (Pensionable service- following CCS(Pension Rules,1972)), submitted technical resignation from the Central Autonomous body and joined the Central Government service in August 1989 on immediate permanent absorption basis.
For the service under the Central Autonomous body, he was granted pro-rata pension and gratuity from the Pension Fund constituted and maintained by the Autonomous body. In accordance with the option available at that time, he drew 100 % lumpsum payment in lieu of pension. The employee is therefore not entitled to count the qualifying service under the Autonomous body as qualifying service under the Central Government for pension. On completion of 15 years, one-third of the pension was restored to him.
The officer has now completed 22 years of qualifying service under the Central Government service and is retiring. As per the latest orders, issued by the Government of India based on the recommendations of the Sixth Pay Commission Report, those who have completed 20 years of qualifying service is eligible for full pension at 50 % of the Average emoluments or the last pay + Grade Pay, which ever is higher.
Is he not eligible for the full pension from the Central Government Office as he has completed more than the minimum qualifying service of 20 years in the Central Government
OR
Is there any specific orders/Rule for restricting it or linking it to the pension he was granted for the pension received from the Autonomous body.
May I request you Sir, to enlighten me on the point or to get the get the point clarified from the Ministry of Personnel at the earliest or at least get it included in the items for consideration of the in the next meeting of the National Anomaly Committee scheduled to be convened in the last week of June 2010.
Sir,
Most respectfully, it is submitted that the 6th Pay Commission came into effect with lot of injustice with the LDCs. It took the post in a very mischievous and unjustified manner by giving Rs.1900/- as Grade Pay. Moreover, it is a grave injustice that an LDC will get increment of Rs.100/- in his GP during his first MACP that is after completion of 10 yrs of service. This clearly shows that all LDCs are non-productive instead of UDCs & Asstt. those will get about Rs.400/- to Rs.1600/- increase in their Grade Pays.
May I put a question before you that; Do LDCs not face the hike of rates in market? Therefore, you are requested to do justice and kindly put up our case before the competent authority? We want JUSTICE. JUSTICE. JUSTICE.
Sir,
I was appointed in group D category on compassionat grounds in the year 1990.after 15 years i got promotion as a Jr.Clerk now am going to complete 20 yrs of service in the moth of june 2010 and i will be elgible for 2nd MACP kindly let me know weather am getting 2800 GP or 2000(GP)if i get 2000 GP. just imagine after serving 10 years in 1900 GP i will be getting benefit of 100 Rs + one increment what a disatarous MACP for a Junior Clerk’s. So pl make some justice for the category of Junior Clerk’s.
I JC-429433-N Nb Clk Nirmal Singh had served in Indian Army for 26 years and discharge from service wef 01 Apr 2006 with pensionary benefits vide PPO No S/051412/2005 (Army). As per the provisions of 6th Pay Commission my service pension has been revised to Rs 8590/- vide PPO No S/CORR/193260 (Army). As per table No 32 of PCDA(P) circular No 430, pension of a Nb Sub (Group Y) having served for 26 years service prior to 01 Jan 2006 has been fixed Rs 10029/- pm wef 01 Jul 2009. Nb Sub retired prior to 01 Jan 2006 is getting more pension than the Nb Sub retired after 01 Jan 2006. The same thing has happened with many other Nb Subedars & Subedars retired after 01 Jan 2006. Sir, this point needs due consideration.
My pay was re-fixed on 18-12-2009 due to my feeder post was upgraded to the 4600/== grade pay.my feeder post was engineering assistant with the grade pay of 4200/=.I was promoted on 30-10-2006 to the grade pay 4600/=.Whether this re-fixation is correct?
It is from very authentic source news that in the monthe of Jun 2010 order regarding hike of G Pay of LDC & UDC will publish. The G Pay of LDC will be Rs 2400 w.e.f 1.1.06 and G Pay of UDC will be Rs 3200/- (New G pay will be intoduced in between Rs 2800/- and Rs 4200/-). Please wait
Regulation of Pension in the case of an employee of Central Autonomous body appointed on immediate absorption basis in Central Government service.
An employee having 17 years of service in a permanent capacity in a Central Government Autonomous body (Pensionable service- following CCS(Pension Rules,1972)), submitted technical resignation and joined the Central Government service in August 1989 on immediate permanent absorption basis.
For the service under the Central Autonomous body, he was granted pro-rata pension and gratuity from the Pension Fund constituted and maintained by the Autonomous body. As per the option available at that time, he drew 100 % lumpsum payment in lieu of pension. The employee is therefore not entitled to count the qualifying service under the Autonomous body as qualifying service under the Central Government for pension. On completion of 15 years, one-third of the pension was restored.
The officer has now completed 22 years of qualifying service under the Central Government service and is retiring. As per the latest orders, issued by the Government of India based on the recommendations of the Sixth Pay Commission Report, those who have completed 20 years of qualifying service is eligible for full pension at 50 % of the Average emoluments or the last pay + Grade Pay, which ever is higher.
Is he not eligible for the full pension from the Central Government Office as he has completed more than the minimum qualifying service of 20 years in the Central Government.
in the 6th cpc dicleared merging of scale 5000-8000 & 5500-9000 JE & MCM But till now dissision of fast track commitee come why delay for dissision
sir it has been clearly mentioned in meeting held on 27.3.2010 that next meeting of national amamoly committe will be held in the month of june 2010. whether that meeting has been held or not.
has any date been fixed for the next meeting of anomaly committee which is scheduled in june 2010.
I am in Scale of 6500-10500. My basic pay was 6900/= as on 01.01.2006. in grade pay 4600/=. What will be my basic pay on 01.01,2006 in 6 CPC. it is class II post.
Thank You.
Now I am getting GP as 4600/-., Please convey to me Whether I am a Group B or Group C officer. Please kindly not that Group C officers are getting GP as 6600/- now. There is no vigilance case in my name.
Rotational transfer is eligible for Group B & Group A officers only. Now I am getting GP as 4600/-, I had doubtful whether I am Group B or Group C officer?. Whether my name can include in the rotational transfer? Pl help me. please clear my doubt.
Pl intimate present status of meeting held for upgradation of grade pay of UDCs of Central Govt. There is a large disparity between UDC and Assistants Grade pay. UDCs are getting Grade pay of Rs.2400/- whereas assistants are getting Rs. 4600/- almost double the amount UDCs are getting. Please intimate present status
As a LDC we are deprived from all respect in Grade pay of 6th CPC as well as MACPS. Please look into the matter to boost up the LDC’s Grade pay in next NAC Meeting.
When will be the next NAC meeting, please publish the date of NAC meeting.
1. I am working in the pay scale of 4500-7000 in Vth pay commission. As per sixth pay commission my pay is 5200-20200 + 2800. Now i am completing 10 years in June 2011.
2. What is the pay band and grade pay after completion of my 10 years of service under MACP?
3. How the 6th pay commission recommendation recommended the pay band for pay scale 5000-9000(5th pay commission) to 9300-34000 + 4200 while the difference in the pay scale 4500-7000 (5th pay commission) is only 500 besides this the pay band of 5200-20200 + 2800?
4. What is the process to filed our case in National Anomaly Committee?
Respected sir,
I am an employee of an autonomous body under UGC which is under MHRD Govt of India since 12.03.1999 at the pay scale 3050-75-3950–80-4590 now it is revised in PB-I ( 5200-20200 with GP-1900). I got MACP on 12.03.2009 after completing 10 years as here is no promotion. The benefit of MACP is only Rs 100 ( 2000-1900)after completing 10 years whereas Group D get benefit 600 (1900-1300)for MACP.
The recommenders are the person who did not not have any efficiency for calculating the LDC’S benefit. It is totally step mothers behaviour to all the LDC staff.
With out help of LDC, the organisation can run.
Please put this to the higher authority for their logical thinking about this matter for hike or revised the PB i.e., from PB-I to PB-02 as early as possible.
Sir,
Most respectfully, it is submitted that the 6th Pay Commission came into effect with lot of injustice with the LDCs. It took the post in a very mischievous and unjustified manner by giving Rs.1900/- as Grade Pay. Moreover, it is a grave injustice that an LDC will get increment of Rs.100/- in his GP during his first MACP that is after completion of 10 yrs of service. This clearly shows that all LDCs are non-productive instead of UDCs & Asstt. those will get about Rs.400/- to Rs.1600/- increase in their Grade Pays.
May I put a question before you that; Do LDCs not face the hike of rates in market? Therefore, you are requested to do justice and kindly put up our case before the competent authority? We want JUSTICE. JUSTICE. JUSTICE.
And also entire temporary status service also should be taken into account for ACP as well as MACP. The same was implemented in Railway Board, But here till in Anamoly committee. Please make it finalize this as early as possible. Because one comrade was expired without the benefit, atleast the family can avail the benefit. Please sir.
Expecting your favourable reply
I joined service in January 1989 in the scale Rs.5000-8000 Prerevised and in April 92 in the scale 5500-9000. What shall be my grade pay as on today? and what will be the grade-pay of my junior who joined with me in january 89 in the same scale i. e. Rs.5000-8000 as a result of MACP.? /
i have joined office as jr.clerk on 22.01.1999 after ten year of service i have awarded ACP. pls clarfiy what is the proceedure is more benefit to me on pay fixation i.e. date of increment
Respected Official & Staff Side Members of the NAC,
Sirs,
It may be seen in this site that there is a tremendous response from the clerical staff expressing their grief and destitute on the grade pay granted to the LDCs and UDCs and the financial upgradation that will be given on completion of 10 years of service under the MACP Scheme. I wonder when will the next NAC meeting held but it is my earnest request to you all Members to pay your kind attention on this most crucial issue and remove the discrepancy/anomaly in the larger interest of the entire clerical staff. I strongly submit the following two demands for consideration please:-
(a) Grade pay of LDCs Rs 2400/- and UDCs Rs 2800/-
(b) Financial upgradation should be granted in terms of promotional norms only and not on hierarchical manner.
Please consider the above points in true spirit keeping into consideration the various related aspects that I had brought out earlier. Looking forward to a favorable orders please.
Thanks. [Subir UDC, Agra]
Leave a Reply