Govt employees near retirement should not be disturbed: CAT

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL – CAT

  
Govt employees near retirement should not be disturbed: CAT
  
The Central Administrative Tribunal has held that government employees on the verge of superannuation should not be disturbed merely because they have stayed for a considerably long period at a particular place.
  
The apex tribunal said that such a benefit should be extended to superannuating employees to retire peacefully at a particular place after years of dedicated service.
  
“Merely because the applicants have a long stay and the transfer order could not be implemented so far would not by itself constitute sufficient reason.
  
“There is an objective based on considerations of welfare behind such provision in the transfer policy as it would enable a person about to retire after a long and devoted service to make arrangements for settling down thereafter with his family, acquire a house if not already done,” Member N D Dayal said.

  
  
  

Source: PTI

September 13, 2010  Tags: , , ,   Posted in: CCS Rules, Expected DA, Uncategorized ďťż

9 Responses

  1. S.M.Thorat - October 9, 2010

    If the de-categorized railway employee is due on verge of superannuation retirement can his transfer out side the station can be retained. As per cat dicisson

  2. K.RAMASUBRAMANIAN - March 7, 2011

    how the term “near retirement” is defined? Any idea? please share the information.

  3. sudhir kumar - April 7, 2011

    I am going to retire from central govt. service in march 2013. I was transferred to another place in Oct.2010. can i come back to my native place if there is a branch of my office.

  4. Amol - April 11, 2011

    Sir, were did i get the detail information of (Govt employees near retirement should not be disturbed: CAT) or what retirement period is applicable for this?? I am near abt to retirement(2years left), after working more than 25 year at same place. I got an transfer order to other location. So please suggest, did i applicable for this scheme?? email:- amol_nimje@rediffmail.com.

  5. sunil - April 19, 2011

    already spouse retention order is not accepted by any of the commissions under central government, due to this irregular activities number of wife and husband are seperated all over the india. whether central tribunal may help to them.

  6. sahoo - April 19, 2011

    The 6th pay commission given instruction to retention of wife and husband at the same station or within the state. But nobody accepting the spouse retention order. Can do any anyful actions by CAT please.

  7. OM PRAKASH SHARAN - August 6, 2011

    sir , my suprannuation date is 31/08/2013; I AM A SR. EXECTIVE IN PUBLIC SECTOR; ON 10TH. JUNE 2011 I WAS FORCED TO CARRY-OUT AN ORDER OF JUNE 2009 AGAINST MY WILLINGNESS.my requests are with the NTPC-C0NCERNS AS BELOW:
    TO, DT.: 23.07.2011
    THE DIRECTOR HUMAN RESURCES,
    NTPC LTD.,
    NTPC BHAWAN, CORE-7, SCOPE COMPLEX,
    7, INSTITUTIONAL AREA, LODHIROAD,
    NEW DELHI-110003 FAX: 01124360912
    Sub: Repeated request of transfer of Sri Om Prakash Sharan ; Employee No :041434; Sr Manager/ C&M/DSTPP is being ignored by your honorable administration since his stay at KBUNL ( from June 2008 TO 10th June 2011). In spite Sri Sharan was forced to carry out the office order no: 82/2009-10 dated.15.5.2009 on 10th. June 2011. i.e. at an interval after two years.
    Sir,
    May please go through the quoting “There is an objective based on considerations of welfare behind such provision in the transfer policy as it would enable a person about to retire after a long and devoted service to make arrangements for settling down thereafter with his family, acquire a house if not already done etc. This would take a reasonable period of time and two years has been considered appropriate” details as below:
    A. September 13, 2010Tags: CAT, Central Administrative Tribunal, Central Government Employees, Near Retirement Posted in: CCS Rules
    CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL – CAT
    Govt employees near retirement should not be disturbed: CAT
    The Central Administrative Tribunal has held that government employees on the verge of superannuation should not be disturbed merely because they have stayed for a considerably long period at a particular place.
    The apex tribunal said that such a benefit should be extended to superannuating employees to retire peacefully at a particular place after years of dedicated service.
    “
    Merely because the applicants have a long stay and the transfer order could not be implemented so far would not by itself constitute sufficient reason.
    “
    There is an objective based on considerations of welfare behind such provision in the transfer policy as it would enable a person about to retire after a long and devoted service to make arrangements for settling down thereafter with his family, acquire a house if not already done,” Member N D Dayal said.
    Based on The above statements of “Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi.OA-1965/2010, New Delhi this the 1st day of September, 2010.Hon ble Sh. N.D. Dayal, Member(A)”it clearly indicates you are doing an injustice to me ignoring my repeated requests for transfer to ER-I-HQ-PATNA. Persons holding honorable chair must respect dignity values of their chair abiding rule of low & justice. Again & Again I am requesting you pl. transfer me to ER-I-HQ- PATTNA on health ground; as stated earlier my both eyes & abdomen are operated , I have to continue on regular checkups at intervals at MAGADH HOSPITAL ; my wife is anemic, low BP, Thyroid -patient , she is continuing her life on regular -checkups. MY RETIREMENT IS ON 31ST AUG 2013 i.e. two years left
    Thanking you
    Your faithfully
    O.P.SHARAN
    SR. MANAGER (C&M)/DSTPP/NTPC
    Copy to:S.ROY/ED /HR – FAX: 011-243149973;R.Venkateswaran / RED/ER-II-HQ FAX:0674-2540919 ;M.S.D.Bhattamishra,/AGM/HR/ER-II-HQ;S.K. REDDY /GM/DSTPP;CMD – for kind information please.

  8. Biju - February 28, 2012

    What is the menaing of bunching in pay fixation.

  9. rao - April 27, 2013

    i was a gazetted officer during 2009 and hardly 4 years srvice for my retirement 2013 was there. but ignoring my health condition and last tenure, intentionally to help their choice candidate i was transferred in interest of service, during the transit where i had to be necessarily ppromoted but by backdoor i was transferred injuring my financial benefits and promotional avenue vindictively when i was ailing and when i issued vrs notice. the vrs was noticenot honoured and extended notices were issued. meanwhile mucch against the vrs sought date, i was retired on vrs after making me to produce a fit certificate befoore the day of unscheduled date of vrs and 3without serving the pucca vrs order signed by the secretary, department.,on 24/12/10. the order was not signed by a competent appinting authority who is vested with retiring powers but by a headd of department without notified delegation. amusingly after 38 years of dedicated service, my pension and gratuity and commutation was paid after another year makingg me a beggar for food from sons and daughters. no interest due on my accumulated delayed pension-commutation amount wantonly withheld along with gratuity was paid roughly 60000/- monly i happened to be a pundit that too in a,p.,postal circle. is there anybody to review these injustices.

Leave a Reply


− 3 = five


× two = 10